The Reserve Bank of India’s third quarter 2011-12
review of Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments released on January 23, 2012
assessed that risk aversion in the global financial markets has slacked the
pace of capital flows to India and if the pace of FDI inflows does not pick up
and FII equity inflows follow their decelerating trend then the CAD (Current
Account Deficit) may have to be financed through debt flows in the coming
quarters.
As per one of the report by RBI, during calendar
year 2011 as a whole, foreign debt inflows amounted to $8.65 billion, out of
which almost half of it came in December. And in the same calendar year it is
said to have recorded a net outflow of equity investment of almost $357
million. On one side there is a recent revival of FII inflows largely in the
debt instrument and on the other there has been a collapse of foreign portfolio
investment flows, leading to an overall fall in the external investment in
equity. But with burgeoning CAD the conclusion arrived that India has to
increase its reliance on debt creating flows to finance its deficit.
Measures such as paving way for Qualified Foreign
Investors (QFI) to invest directly in India’s equity market is an explanation
by the UPA government to establish the fact that it is countering the formed
view of “policy paralysis” and boosting again the positivity in the
market. But they are also driven by the
need to reverse the slowdown in inflows of foreign portfolio investment. The
decline in FII inflows has been attributed to the development abroad, which
required FII to book their profits in India and repatriate their funds to meet
commitments or cover losses at home.
One danger is that though the government is trying
with different measures to infuse positivity in the market by allowing direct
access to equity markets but still it becomes difficult or rather impossible
for Indian regulators to fully rein in these global players and impose
conditions on their financing, trading and accounting practices, controlling
unbridled speculation required by them to be regulated at the point of origin.
And, if such investors do come in the Indian market then it would be with the
intent of reaping capital gains through short term trades.
Thus to make this measure successful it would mark a
transition towards allowing a more speculative base of such players in the
market but defending that aspect on the ground that it would help to reduce the
dependence on debt is indeed questionable.
Why not to open the commodity exchanges also.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you SHSF but before opening the commodity market for the foreign investors it is really important to initiate that movement by amending the APMC Act which acts as an impediment in the domestic market for the COMEXs.
ReplyDeleteDisentanglement of domestic market would pave way for the freeing up of COMEXs for foreign investors.
P.S: Please Do specify your Name it makes conversation more meaningful. (if possible)